Tax Cuts Act Hurts Small Corporations

January 30th, 2019

When we attended the Christmas party for one of the small fabrication companies we represent in December 2018, the owner announced that employee bonuses would be less this year because his corporate tax rate went up from 15% to 21%. As manufacturers sales representatives, we wondered if other small corporations were being similarly hurt.

When President Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on December 22, 2017, business and economic experts lauded the reduction in corporate tax rates as one way to help American companies be more competitive in the global marketplace. The National Association of Manufacturers and the U. S. Chamber of Commerce had long complained that the U. S. had the highest corporate tax rate in the world at 39.1 percent, which the Tax Foundation explained was “a combination of our 35 percent federal rate and the average rate levied by U.S. states.”

Doing research, I found an article titled “Trump’s Tax Plan and How It Affects You” on The Balance website.  I learned that the Act permanently cut the corporate tax rate from a progressive rate of 15 percent to as high as 35 percent down to a flat tax rate of 21 percent beginning in 2018, the lowest since 1939. Besides C corporations, the corporate tax rate also applies to LLC’s who have elected to be taxed as corporations. This rate does not apply to S corporations, partnerships or sole proprietorships, which are taxed at the personal tax rate, ranging from 10% to the new limit of 37%.

Most people didn’t realize that while the previous tax rate for corporations started at only 15%, and went up to 35 percent, the average “effective rate was 18.6 percent,” according to a 2017 report by the Congressional Budget Office.

At the Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council’s website, it states that “according to the Census Bureau’s Statistics of U.S. Businesses for employer C corporations in 2015, 99.0 percent of all business are small businesses” with fewer than 500 employees as defined by the Small business Administration; “96.4 percent of firms had fewer than 100” and “84.9 percent of firms had fewer than 20 employees.”

This means that the majority of C corporations paid tax rates well below the maximum tax rate of 35%. Therefore, the flat tax of 21 percent replacing is hurting low-earning corporations that were paying a lower rate and benefiting high-earning wealthy corporations.

The Balance website also states: “The Act allows companies to repatriate the $2.6 trillion they hold in foreign cash stockpiles. They pay a one-time tax rate of 15.5 percent on cash and 8 percent on equipment.”

The reason corporate monies need to be repatriated is that according to Wikipedia, “tax deferral is one of the main features of the worldwide tax system that allows U.S. multinational companies to delay paying taxes on foreign profits. Under U.S. tax law, companies are not required to pay U.S. tax on their foreign subsidiaries’ profits for many years, even indefinitely until the earnings are returned to U.S.”

Thus, repatriation benefited wealthy corporations because they are the ones that shifted manufacturing to subsidiary plants outside of the United States in the past 20 years. It is unlikely that any small business has a plant outside of the U.S., and thus wouldn’t have any profits stockpiled offshore to repatriate.

In the last two years, I wrote two articles about corporate tax reform at the federal level based on the Sales Factor Apportionment Framework proposed by one of the members of the Coalition for a Prosperous America, Bill Parks. Mr. Parks is a retired finance professor and founder of NRS Inc., an Idaho-based paddle sports accessory maker. He asserted that “Tax reform proposals won’t fix our broken corporate system… [because] they fail to fix the unfairness of domestic companies paying more tax than multinational enterprises in identical circumstances.”

He explained that multinational enterprises (MNEs) use cost accounting practices to transfer costs and profits. “Currently MNEs manipulate loopholes in our tax system to avoid paying U. S. taxes… MNEs can legitimately choose a cost that reduces or increases the profits of its subsidiaries in different countries. Because the United States is a relatively high-tax country, MNEs will choose the costs that minimize profits in the United States and maximize them in what are usually lower-tax countries.”

The way his plan would work is that the amount of corporate taxes that a multinational company would pay “would be determined solely on the percent of that company’s world-wide sales made to U. S. customers. Foreign MNEs would also be taxed the same way on their U. S. income leveling the playing field between domestic firms and foreign and domestic MNEs.”

On January 24, 2019. the Coalition for a Prosperous America (CPA) released a Press Release stating that  a letter was sent to both the Senate Finance and House Ways & Means Committees asking “for consideration of both a destination-based Sales Factor Apportionment tax system (SFA) and a Strategic Goods and Services Tax (GST).”

A Goods and Services Tax (GST) is a strategic consumption tax, which would improve America’s trade competitiveness. The Release states: “Currently, foreign governments charge US exporters value-added (VAT) taxes—averaging 17 percent globally—at their borders. Most of these countries have reduced tariffs over the last 45 years—but replaced them with value added taxes. They use this new revenue to reduce other taxes and costs, and to fund national pension systems and health care. The US is virtually alone in not collecting value added taxes on imports.”

CEO Michael Stumo said, “Congress should fix this foreign trade advantage through an innovative and strategic consumption tax called a Goods and Services Tax…a 13 percent GST could raise $1.4 trillion in revenue and fund a full credit against payroll taxes, reduce personal income taxes, and provide a credit for healthcare costs. US companies would benefit from the cost reduction and receive a 13 percent GST rebate when exporting. Foreign companies would pay a 13 percent GST tax when bringing goods into the US.”

Stumo continued, “Tax reform can reduce our trade deficit, drastically reduce complexity and put even more Americans to work in good paying jobs. Congress should tax the profits and sales of all companies selling here and eliminate taxes on exports. The combination of an SFA and a strategic GST is the most pro-American tax system Congress could devise.”

It’s time that small American domestic corporations stop bearing the brunt of corporate taxes that benefit the large multinational enterprises.  Bi-partisan tax reform that benefits all Americans should be made a priority by our newly elected Congressional Representatives and Senators.

Tags: ,
Posted in Legislation, Manufacturing, Taxes/Regulations | No Comments »

Upcoming Southern California Events

January 16th, 2019

We have a busy first few months of trade shows and conferences for 2019. I will be attending the following shows for at least one day to keep up with the latest technologies and industry news for writing future articles.

I’m also beginning the year with several webinars in January – March.  I am giving two webinars on “How to Return Manufacturing to the U.S. Using Total Cost of Ownership Analysis” on two dates, Tuesday, January 22nd (Register here) and Wednesday, January 30th (Register here).

Then, I’m giving one Tuesday, February 12th, on “How We Can Solve the Skill Shortage and Attract the Next Generation of Manufacturing Workers.” Register here.

On February 5-7, 2019, the UBM Advanced Manufacturing Expo & Conference

will be held at the Anaheim Convention Center, Anaheim, CA

This conference will be part of the five shows being held concurrently at the Center.

Register Here

 Register Here

Expo Hours for all shows:

 February 5, 10:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.

February 6, 10:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.

February 7, 10:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m.

 

AFCEA/USNI WEST Conference
Registration Center
11208 Waples Mill Road, Suite 112
Fairfax, VA 22030
(888) 273-5706 / (703) 449-6418
Register

Why Attend AFCEA:

Attend three days of open discussions with defense and maritime leaders. Gain a better understanding of the impacts and implications of the new National Security Strategy. Hear about the current set of challenges facing the Navy, Marine Corps and Coast Guard, and be a part of the dialogue on the opportunities and solutions to address these concerns.

CONNECT

Spend time with military, government and industry ‘out of the office’ and ‘outside of the beltway.’ Engage with speakers, attendees and exhibitors and discuss ideas and insights. Afternoon happy hours on the exhibit floor provide an opportunity to network with thought leaders.

INNOVATE

Explore and experience the latest platforms, leading edge technologies and state-of-the-art networking capabilities that support the Sea Services operations. Visit over 300 maritime exhibits.

 

IPC APEX EXPO 2019 is a five-day event like no other in the printed circuit board and electronics manufacturing industry. Professionals from around the world come together to participate in the Technical Conference, Exhibition, and Professional Development, Standards Development and Certification programs. These activities offer seemingly endless education and networking opportunities that impact your career and company by providing you the knowledge, technical skills and best practices to address any challenge you face.

Exhibition Hours

Tuesday, January 29           10:00 am–6:00 pm

Wednesday, January 30     9:00 am–6:00 pm

Thursday, January 31         9:00 am–2:00 pm

About IPC

IPC is a global trade association dedicated to furthering the competitive excellence and financial success of its members, who are participants in the electronics industry. In pursuit of these objectives, IPC will devote resources to management improvement and technology enhancement programs, the creation of relevant standards, protection of the environment, and pertinent government relations.

Register Here

Conference: April 29 – May 2, 2019 | Exhibits: April 30 – May 1

Long Beach Convention Center, 300 East Ocean Blvd, Long Beach, California

Conference Hours:

Tuesday, April 30, 2019 | 10:30 AM – 4:00 PM

Wednesday, May 1, 2019 | 10:30 AM – 4:00 PM

Thursday, May 2, 2019 | 9:00 AM – 12:00 PM

Exposition:

Tuesday, April 30, 2019 | 10:00 AM – 5:30 PM

Wednesday, May 1, 2019 | 10:00 AM – 5:30 PM

Dates and times for workshops, tours, and networking receptions are being determined. Check back for updates.

Register Now

 

For those of you in San Diego County, you may also want to attend the free Economic Roundtable on Thursday, January 17, 2019.

What does the San Diego County economy look like for 2019 and beyond? Join  the lively discussion with a panel of experts covering the future of the economy, housing/homelessness, military, and diversity and inclusion. Experts will provide predictions and their perspective on what may be in store for San Diego County.

Session One:

Ray Major, Chief Economist, SANDAG

Ryan Ratcliff, Associate Professor of Economics, USD School of Business

Sarah Burns, Director of Research and Evaluation, San Diego Workforce Partnership

Session Two:

Housing/Homelessness: Stephen Maduli-Williams, Community Development Program Manager, City of San Diego

Military: Jesse Gipe, Senior Manager, Economic Development, San Diego Regional Development Corporation

Diversity and Inclusion: Dwayne Crenshaw, CEO and Co-Founder, RISE San Diego

Date: Thursday, January 17, 2019

Time:

Networking: 8–8:30 a.m.

Program: 8:30 a.m.–noon

Location:

University of San Diego—Joan B. Kroc Institute for Peace & Justice

5998 Alcala Park, San Diego, CA 92110

Cost: Free

Save Your Seat

 

 

Tags: ,
Posted in Economy, Innovation, Manufacturing | No Comments »

Navarro Warns of Fragility of U.S. Manufacturing and Defense Industrial Base

December 4th, 2018

If you don’t watch CSpan, you missed an important speech by Dr. Peter Navarro, White House National Trade Council and Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy Director, on November 9th at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D. C.

Dr. Navarro spoke about the manufacturing and defense industrial base and how U.S. economic strength is an element of national security and how it fits with the Trump strategy in dealing with the broader economic and defense issues. Dr. Navarro said that in December 2017, as part of formulating a national security strategy, President Trump introduced the maxim that “economic security is national security.”

He explained that everything that the Trump administration has done is part of this strategy, such as tax cuts, deregulation to reduce the onerous regulations put in place by the Obama Administration, ending the war on coal, and the steel and aluminum tariffs. These are all part of supply side economics to help companies be more competitive and grow in a non-inflationary way.

He commented that instead of the “doom and gloom” of economists, there has been “a flood of new investment and capital expenditures” by steel and aluminum companies, and “the waivers granted by the Department of Transportation have gone down from a flood to a trickle.”

He said, “In my estimation, we have the finest U. S. Trade Representative in U. S. history.  Doing the Section 301 investigation was a power that lay dormant for decades. This is the way we are able to now protect our technology from Chinese predation.  It has been tremendously successful in doing that.”

He outlined how Trump’s tough trade policy, backed up by tough action, has led to the renegotiation of two out of the three main trade deals – NAFTA, the Korea deal, and the WTO.  With regard to NAFTA, now called the USMCA, he said, “The whole essence is a provision to bring domestic content back onshore and share the fruits of the assembly and supply chain with our neighbors to the south and to the north. This is a deal which will strengthen all three countries and strengthen the defense industrial base.”

He commented that President Trump is a man who thinks every day about how to put more American men and women back to work, particularly those who work with their hands. He discussed how during his time on President Trump’s campaign trail, a report came out stating that one out of four people were out of the workforce, the so-called “discouraged workers” – men and women who had given up looking for work. He said, “We were told that the jobs for people who work with their hands were never coming back. Now, we have historically low unemployment., and rising employment among Blacks, Hispanics, and woman. Over a million people are back in the workforce through a fundamental restructuring of the manufacturing and industrial base.  It isn’t just the quantity of jobs; it’s the quality of jobs.”

He said, “I was blessed to be part of a large team that restructured the sale of arms to our allies and partners.  From an economic security point of view, it means more jobs here, good jobs with higher wages.  When you reactivate a supply chain, you activate 400 suppliers in that supply chain in 41 states. It helps expand production lines. If you are able to sell arms to allies and partners, it makes that country stronger.”

He then turned his attention to the findings of the “Assessing and Strengthening the Manufacturing and Defense Industrial Base and Supply Chain Resiliency of the United States Report” that was prepared by the Interagency Task Force in Fulfillment of President Trump’s Executive Order 13806.

He said that an Interagency Task Force, led by DoD, created sixteen working groups with over 300 subject matter experts from across the federal government. Nine working groups focused on traditional industrial sectors, and seven working groups assessed enabling cross-cutting capabilities, such as machine tools. The report revealed that there are almost 300 gaps and vulnerabilities in America’s manufacturing and defense industrial base.  The Executive Summary states, “Currently, the industrial base faces an unprecedented set of challenges: sequestration and uncertainty of government spending; the decline of critical markets and suppliers; unintended consequences of U.S. Government acquisition behavior; aggressive industrial policies of competitor nations; and the loss of vital skills in the domestic workforce.”

Dr. Navarro asked the rhetorical questions, “How did we get to the place where the greatest military power in the world faces serious gaps, close to 300 gaps, in the defense industrial base?…What happens when you randomly cut off dollars from the defense department?

He explained, “There are five macro forces that bear down on the defense industrial base:

  1. Budgets and sequestration
  2. Decline of American manufacturing capability and capacity
  3. S. government procurement practices
  4. Industrial policies of competitor nations
  5. Decline of U.S. STEM and trade skills

He commented that the decline of the manufacturing base itself was due to the forces of globalization as well as the industrial policies and unfair trade practices of our economic competitors, our so-called allies, and our strategic rivals, particularly China.  He said, “This report called out China for its policies of economic aggression…China is engaged in unfair trade practices and currency manipulation.  From 2003 to 2014, it was documented that China was the worse currency manipulator in the world…so that we are running up annual trade deficits of half a billion dollars.”

He showed a chart, titled “China’s Categories of Economic Aggression.”  He said, “This chart is founded on the underlying assumption that China is a non-market economy, a state-directed economy. They use international rules when they benefit them and violate them when it’s to their benefit.”  He outlined` six economic strategies that China uses:

  • Protect their home markets from competition and imports
  • Protect China’s share of global markets
  • Secure and control core natural resources globally
  • Dominate traditional manufacturing industries
  • Acquire key technologies and Intellectual Property from other countries and the U. S.
  • Capture emerging industries of the future that will drive future growth and advancement in defense industries.

He said, “There are over 50 ways that China engages in these acts, policies and practices s to achieve these strategies…, if you could negotiate to eliminate 25 of these tactics, you would still have 25 that would hurt us.”

This point is very relevant to the preliminary agreement that President Trump negotiated with Chinese President Xi Xinping at the G20 this past weekend. The agreement included a 90-day delay to the planned January increase in US Section 301 tariffs—which were set to rise from 10 percent to 25 percent on $200B of Chinese imports.

Judging from past history of negotiations with China, it is unlikely that China will keep their part of the bargain of this latest agreement. It will probably unravel before the 90 days are up. Dr. Navarro alluded to the problem of negotiating with China when he said, “The biggest problem is the trust issues. One of the things about working in the White House is that you can ask for stuff. I asked them to give me all the instances where China has agreed to something and then not kept their promise. I got back like five pages of stuff going back 30 years. It’s frightening…”

Space does not permit me to cover his discussion of the tactics China uses. Through research, I discovered that Dr, Navarro had used this same chart when he spoke to the Hudson Institute on Thursday, June 28, 2018, an image of which can be viewed at this link..  It looks to me that he created the chart to be a visual summary of key points made in his report, “How China’s Economic Aggression Threatens the Technologies and Intellectual Property of the United States and the World,” which he submitted to President Trump in June 2018.

His comments included mention that the globalization of the supply chain has resulted in having only a single source for some critical product or components. For example, he mentioned that there is only one company that can make turrets for tanks. He said, “The F-34 has a seven-tier supply chain, and you need to make sure that production lines for parts can continue and expand if there is a surge of demand…If you have foreign sources for products and components, that is a big problem, especially if China is the source.”

He also briefly commented on the problem of the decline of U. S. STEM and trade skills saying that if you have labor shortages because you don’t have enough skilled labor, that is a problem.

He concluded by saying, “The day that Pat Shanahan turned in the report, DoD and other agencies of government were already moving forward to fill these gaps and vulnerabilities. The day that the report was handed in, we signed two Defense Protection Act Title III orders that would help a couple of small companies in that fragile supply chain…We have initiatives for the national defense stock pile program to help with critical material issues. There is an effort to modernize the organic industrial base…This administration is working tirelessly, tirelessly, to fix those gaps and vulnerabilities. This effort really is the purest expression of the principle of economic security is national security.  We will strengthen America’s manufacturing and defense industrial base, and in the process, we will create jobs and build factories and better protect our homeland…”

I’ve made the point repeatedly that we can’t protect our national security or even defend our country without a strong manufacturing base. After writing about how and why we needed to save and now rebuild our manufacturing industry by writing three books and over 300 articles since 2009, it is gratifying to me that action is finally being taken to address this situation the Trump Administration.

Tags: , ,
Posted in Economy, National security, Trade Policy | No Comments »

How tariffs Could Rebalance U.S. trade relations with China

November 27th, 2018

President Trump has been accused by many of starting a trade war. Are we really in a trade war and did the U. S. start it?  Economist Ian Fletcher recently stated “I define trade war as a cycle of tariff and retaliation where the retaliations are driven not by rational desire to balance trade or achieve the benefits of a tariff-protected economy, but simply by one-upping the other side’s last cycle of retaliation…I believe it is absolutely crucial to make the distinction between trade war, and the ongoing trade conflicts which have always been going on even under nominally free-trade circumstances, clear to the public.  If China imposing tariffs on us for years hasn’t been “trade war,” why is it suddenly “trade war” now that we’re doing the exact same thing?”

Michael Stumo, CEO of the Coalition for a Prosperous America, recently stated, “China started the trade war in 1994 with currency devaluation and state-directed capitalism. Then they got better at it.”

Mr. Stumo is right because for the past 24 years, the U. S. has experienced an ever-increasing trade deficit with China, transferring America’s wealth to China and losing nearly six million manufacturing jobs. In 1994, our trade deficit with China was $29.5 billion, and by 2004, it had doubled to $162.3 billion. After a slight dip in 2009 during the depths of the Great Recession, the trade deficit grew to $375 billion in 2017.

Previous administrations did nothing to fight against the trade war that China started.  In fact, they aided China’s efforts to win the trade war starting when China was granted “Most Favored Nation” status by Present Clinton in 2000.

The January 31, 2017 report, “Growth in U.S.–China trade deficit between 2001 and 2015 cost 3.4 million jobs,” written by Robert Scott, Director of Trade and Manufacturing Research at the Economic Policy Institute, states that when China entered into the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001, “it was supposed to bring it into compliance with an enforceable, rules-based regime that would require China to open its markets to imports from the United States and other nations by reducing Chinese tariffs and addressing nontariff barriers to trade.”

However, Scott wrote, “China both subsidizes and dumps massive quantities of exports. Specifically, it blocks imports, pirates software and technology from foreign producers, manipulates its currency, invests in massive amounts of excess production capacity in a range of basic industries, often through state owned enterprises (SOEs) …China has also engaged in extensive and sustained currency manipulation over the past two decades, resulting in persistent currency misalignments.”

Robert D. Atkinson, President of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) expanded on Chinese mercantilist policies in his report, “Enough is Enough:  Confronting Chinese Innovation Mercantilism (February 2012). He wrote, “China’s strategy is to win in virtually all industries, especially advanced technology products and services… China’s policies represent a departure from traditional competition and international trade norms. Autarky [a policy of national self-sufficiency], not trade, defines China’s goal. As such China’s economic strategy consists of two main objectives: 1) develop and support all industries that can expand exports, especially higher value-added ones, and reduce imports; 2) and do this in a way that ensures that Chinese-owned firms win.”

In a speech to the Hudson Institute on October 4, 2018, Vice President Mike Pence stated, “Over the past 17 years, China’s GDP has grown 9-fold…And the Chinese Communist Party has also used an arsenal of policies inconsistent with free and fair trade, including tariffs, quotas, currency manipulation, forced technology transfer, intellectual property theft, and industrial subsidies doled out like candy, to name a few. These policies have built Beijing’s manufacturing base, at the expense of its competitors – especially America.

He commented, “Yet previous administrations all but ignored China’s actions – and in many cases, they abetted them. But those days are over. Under President Trump’s leadership, the United States of America has been defending our interests with renewed American strength…we’re also implementing tariffs on $250 billion in Chinese goods, with the highest tariffs specifically targeting the advanced industries that Beijing is trying to capture and control. And the President has also made clear that we’ll levy even more tariffs, with the possibility of substantially more than doubling that number, unless a fair and reciprocal deal is made.”

Most people are unaware that America staunchly protected its domestic industries with tariffs on imports until the end of WWII.  On August 16, 2018, MarketWatch published an article by Jeffrey Bartash, in which he stated, “One of the very first bills new President George Washington signed, for instance, was the Tariff Act of 1789. He inked the bill on July 4 of that year. The tariff of 1789 was designed to raise money for the new federal government, slash Revolutionary War debt and protect early-stage American industries from foreign competition.

Most goods entering the U.S. were subjected to a 5% tariff, though in a few cases the rates ranged as high as 50%. It was the first of many tariffs that Congress passed over a century and a half. They generated the vast majority of federal revenue until the U.S. adopted an income tax in 1913. In some years tariffs funded as much as 95% of the government’s annual budget.”

Why did we allow the Chinese to win the trade war for so long?  Because our economic “experts” and advisers to past administrations naively thought that free trade and free markets would have a transformative effect on China’s totalitarian form of government, gradually democratizing it.

The question is whether or not the tariffs will help rebalance U. S. trade with China.  In the article posted on the trade blog of the Coalition for a Prosperous America (CPA) on July 30, 2018, CPA Research Director Jeff Ferry examines “China’s heavy dependence on – or overexposure to – the US for their trade surplus and their exports. He wrote, “But the fundamental message of all the data is that the US is not only the world’s number one consumer and importer, but China’s number one customer. That makes China more dependent on us than we are on them.”

In other words, China would be hurt more by the tariffs reducing their imports to the U. S. than the U. S. would be hurt by having to pay more for imports. Over time, the tariffs would rebalance our trade with China as imports of Chinese goods are reduced, which would reduce our deficit with China.

In contrast to numerous articles projecting job losses from the tariffs, the Coalition for a Prosperous America (CPA) published a press release on August 17, 2018, that provided “details of its new ‘Tariff Job Creation Tracker’ that tallied US manufacturing jobs gained in the wake of recent tariff actions. CPA found 11,100 jobs announced or planned in four major sectors affected by tariffs. These results have now prompted a corresponding study of job losses related to the tariffs. To date, CPA has identified only 514 jobs lost specifically due to tariffs—which means that job gains exceed job losses by a 20:1 ratio.”

On November 27, 2018, CPA released a press release: “Steel Tariffs Creating Jobs, Boosting GDP” which stated:  “This ground-breaking economics study by the CPA Economics team shows that the steel tariffs are benefiting the US economy,” said CPA Chairman Dan DiMicco. “The same is true for other tariffs implemented this year. If we continue to follow rational trade policies, the benefits will be felt by every worker, farmer, and shareholder in the US.”

CPA Research Director Jeff Ferry said, “The performance of the US economy since the steel tariff was implemented in March has been outstanding, with over a million more jobs in the US economy today than in March, and GDP growth roughly half a point higher than economists had predicted.”

Already the tariffs are resulting in an expansion of U. S. steels jobs and investment by U. S. steel companies in their facilities. On August 17, 2018  Manufacturing News & Insight featured this article “US Steel to Invest $750M in Gary  Works Plant in Indiana” stating, ”U.S. Steel plans to spend at least $750 million to upgrade a century-old steel mill along northwestern Indiana’s Lake Michigan shoreline…Company and government officials said Thursday that the project will help preserve Gary Works’ nearly 3,900 steelworker jobs, and could help ensure the 112-year-old mill lasts another century. The investment accounts for more than a third of U.S. Steel’s $2 billion asset revitalization program…”

Manufacturing is the foundation of the U.S. economy and our country’s large middle class. Losing the critical mass of our manufacturing base would result in the loss of the large portion of our middle class that depends on manufacturing jobs. American manufacturers supply the military with essentials including tanks, fighter jets, submarines, and other high-tech equipment. We can’t manufacture these goods without domestic steel and aluminum.  If we lose the domestic capacity to produce steel and aluminum, our national defense would be in danger, and it would be impossible to maintain our country’s position as the superpower of the free world. Let’s give them time to work to rebuild our U. S. steel and aluminum industries.  Hopefully, the tariffs will inspire China to open up their markets to U. S. goods to create to a freer, more open trade relationship between our two countries.

Tags: , ,
Posted in Jobs, National security, Trade Policy | No Comments »

How the STE@M™ Mentoring Program Helps Students Focus on Manufacturing Careers

November 13th, 2018

MFG Day gets better every year and is inspiring youth to pursue careers in manufacturing. In California, Governor Brown even proclaimed the month of October as the Manufacturing Awareness and Appreciation month. However, MFG Day only occurs once a year.  How can we help keep students focused on pursuing careers in manufacturing throughout the year?

 

One way is the STE@M™ Mentoring Program developed by Cari Lyn Vinci of InVINCIble Enterprises to train educators and youth leaders so they can motivate the next generation of students. InVINCIble Enterprises’ award-winning STE@M™ Mentoring Program is based on the book, Playbook for Teens,. about which I have written previously.

Through the STE@M™ Mentoring Program, teens learn how an interest in STEM subjects translates to opportunities in STEM careers. The Program helps students answer two age-old questions:

  • “Why do I have to learn that?” and
  • “What am I going to do when I grow up?”

The Program is used in middle and high schools as an after school, pull-out during class time, lunch-time, or club activity. The Program takes a group of students through 8 – 24 sessions (called Master Minds) focused around STEAM topics with local guest speakers. Master Minds are paired with POWER skills like public speaking, leadership, critical thinking, communication and collaboration. Students visualize being CEO’s of their lives, contributing to society as business owners, leaders, and workers in STEM industries.

The program incorporates team building and a reflection process, and students discuss how to apply what they are learning to their own lives. Students experience real networking opportunities and mentoring from adults and from each other. The outcome is that students create their own Playbook for Success with one of four goals after high school:

  • Community College or Trade School
  • 4-year or advanced degree
  • Military
  • Apprenticeship or an alternative goal that includes education

The program concludes with a Celebration that involves students presenting their own Playbook for Success while letting parents, educators, and peers know what help they need to achieve their chosen goals.

In an email to his educator network, Gary Page, Education Programs Consultant for the Career Technical Education Leadership Office in Sacramento, wrote “The STE@M™ Mentoring Program provides professional development training and resources to implement a guided, well-articulated career education program. Because the program reflects the Community College’s STRONG Workforce standards, Vinci was recognized by the California Chancellor’s Office as a STRONG Workforce Champion.”

The STE@M™ Mentoring Program supports:

  • New World of Work – 21st Century Skills
  • STRONG Workforce Initiative
  • California Guided Pathways
  • Common Core and Career Technical Education (CTE) Model Curriculum Standards
  • CA After School Network Quality Standards
  • National Career Development Guidelines.
  • California Department of Education Standards/California Common Core ELA Standards

Through Professional Development of educators and professionals, this award-winning Program is being introduced to students in schools and by non-profits who serve middle schools and teens throughout California. This training is within the California After School Network Power of Discovery System.

When I interviewed Ms. Vinci last week, she said, “We started to facilitate Professional Trainings on the STE@M™ Mentoring Program in August 2016. These were sponsored by the Small Business, Deputy Sector Navigators Doing What Matters grant from the Chancellors Office. Trainings have taken place in Fresno, Merced, Monterey, Mt. Shasta College/Eureka, Oceanside, Sacramento, San Diego, San Joaquin, San Luis Obispo, Stockton, Ventura, and Woodland.

When educators implement the program, they reach 15-25 students in each “MasterMind” session. As a result, we have impacted over 7,000 students, parents, and teachers.

In addition to the California Chancellor’s Office STRONG Workforce Champion recognition, we have been acknowledged by the National Association of Women Business Owners with their Visionary Award; by Soroptimist with a RUBY award; and Program of Excellence from the Woodland School Board & the Yolo County Office of Education.”

She explained, “We are partnering with PRO Youth and Families non-profit organization in Sacramento for a proposal to train 300 Educators in 29 counties, spanning seven regions in the California County Superintendents Educational Services Association (CCSESA), which would impact over 6,000 youth.

We also have a media partnership with Diversity in STEAM Magazine. When we are invited to speak at conferences, meetings, and trainings, we provide a complimentary hard copy of the magazine and a free 1-year digital subscription. www.diversitycomm.net/inVINCIbleEnterprises

Diversity in STEAM Magazine (DISM) is dedicated to the advancement of all minorities, women and K-12 students within STEM. DISM provides and informs cutting edge concepts and is the link between the qualified students, career and business candidates, educational institutions, corporate America, and the federal government.”

In conclusion, Ms. Vinci said, “We are connecting the dots in the Woodland School District – where we piloted the STE@M™ Mentoring Program in 2016. This past August, the California After School Network (ASES) coordinators and their tutors were trained to bring the STE@M™ Mentoring Program to their 5th and 6th grade students. The goal is to bridge the gap and keep students motivated about STEAM careers as they transition from middle school to high school to an education after high school.”

Ms. Vinci explained that the training is a full day and includes:

  • Printed curriculum materials
  • Professional Development Training Guide for 8 – 24 session STE@M™ Mentoring Program with detailed Lesson Plans, Student Handouts & Teacher Resources
  • Planning checklists for MasterMinds and Celebration
  • Print Playbook for Teens
  • All Educators receive Playbooks for their first group of students
  • Digital Access to:
    • PowerPoint presentations for all sessions + Celebration
    • PDF version of Training Guide
    • Additional Resources & Updates
  •  Implementation Support:
    • Educators receive on-going phone support and one mid-point virtual coaching session.
  • Guidance to personalize the Program for their sites
  • Assistance identifying guest speakers and phone mentors
  • Invitation to STE@M™ Mentoring Program LinkedIn Group and Facebook

The most recent STE@M™ Mentoring Program PD Training was held in October in Ventura.  Gayla Jurevich, the Small Business & Entrepreneurship DSN with the California Community College STRONG Workforce, sponsored the event for educators from Kern, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara & Ventura Counties. Jeff Hamlin, the STEAM Hub Lead for Expanded Learning at the Ventura County STEM Network was the other co-host.

After the event, Ms. Jurevich said: “What I love about the STE@M™ Mentoring Program is that it reinforces the STRONG Workforce Goals and encourages girls who have an interest in STEM subjects to visualize the possibilities. Instead of losing interest in middle school (which many girls do) the program encourages them to continue on a pathway to a STEAM career.”

Jeff Hamlin commented: “Ventura County is excited to bring the STE@M™ Mentoring Program to our After-School Program because it raises the bar of quality of our programs, plus it aligns with the California After School Quality standards.

Research tells us that kids are deciding as early as 5th grade if they like science or math. That decision closes the door to future career opportunities in the growing STEM industries. For that reason, it’s important that students see the potential early. Also, the program incorporates 21st Century skills like communication, collaboration & critical thinking. These skills are beneficial for students regardless of their future career choices.”

Here’s what Paisley, an 8th grade student at Twelve Bridges STEAM Middle School, Lincoln, CA, said at her group’s Celebration, “I plan to have a career in sports medicine. I know this is right for me for me because it fits all the parts of the Career Sweet Spot™ that I read about in my Playbook for Teens. Sports Medicine will use my talent for science; it fits my outgoing personality to help patients; the market outlook shows potential for growth, I have a passion for helping people; and the investment in my education shows promise because sports medicine is a growth industry.” (To see how students are benefitting from the STE@M™ Mentoring Program, please watch their transformation in these videos)

Here’s what Ted Ruiz, a one parent of one of the girls who went through the mentoring program held in Woodland in 2017 wrote, “As a parent of a teenage girl I want to make sure my daughter has every opportunity to succeed. When I learned my daughter was invited to participate in the Play Book For Teens /STE@M mentoring program I thought it would be a great way for her to be exposed to new career paths. At the completion of the program I realized the program was much more than simply learning about STE@M.

The girls in this program learned soft skills that are not provided in any other setting. The networking, researching, interviews, camaraderie, and interactions learned through the program are not taught in our current “teach for the test” educational setting. The girls who participated are years ahead of their peers when it comes to soft skills. Not every girl will be a rocket scientist or doctor, but every girl will need to know how to interact with strangers, present themselves professionally, and collaborate to be successful in life. As a parent I wish programs like this were mandated for all student.”

Ms. Vinci will be presenting at a Pre-conference workshop on November 28, 2018, “Building an Equitable 21st Century Workforce – Starting Early & Nurturing the Pipeline from K-12 to Careers from 1:00 – 2:30 PM; “Peek into the future – get an understanding of why and how the workplace has changed and where it is headed. This TED-talk panel discussion encompasses points of view from educators and business people on the important tools and practicality of building a STRONG workforce.”  This pre-conference session is the day prior to the California Perkins Joint Special Population Annual CTE Equity and Access Conference November 29-30, 2018 in Sacramento, CA.

Can you imagine what our schools and communities would be like if all students had such clarity of purpose for their future careers?  Ms. Vinci has the goal of expanding this mentoring program across the country. This type of mentoring program would go a long way towards filling the pipeline of workers needed in the manufacturing industry as well as other STEM industries.

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Education, Training, Workforce Development | No Comments »

Innovative Products Featured at San Diego Inventors Forum Invention Contest

November 6th, 2018

This year’s invention contest held on October 11, 2018 by the San Diego Inventors Forum was incredible. I’ve been attending the contests for nine years, and this year, there were so many unique, useful inventions that it was very difficult to vote for my favorite invention.

The mission of the San Diego Inventors Forum is to help inventors to become entrepreneurs to create new companies and jobs here in San Diego. Monthly meetings have been held on the 2nd Thursday of each month. Meetings are held at AMN Healthcare, 12400 High Bluff Drive, San Diego, CA 92130.The next meeting will be this Thursday, November 8, 2018.  Networking starts at 6:30 pm, and the meeting starts at 7:00 pm.

At the monthly meetings, inventors meet other successful, local inventors in many different fields and learn how they developed their marketable products. The give inventors the opportunity to network with fellow creative people and get guidance and encouragement to take their first or next steps necessary to turn their ideas into a reality.

At the beginning of each meeting, new attendees are able to introduce themselves and ask financing, business, licensing, marketing, legal and engineering questions.  They can present their ideas to private individuals or for focus group review.  They also get to ask for particular resources they are looking for so their needs can be matched.  During the “Who Needs Who?” portion of the meeting, service providers can personally introduce their services.

Inventors can pay $100 for a one-year membership or pay $10 for each meeting they attend. During the course of the year, program topics cover everything subject you need to know from capturing the concept to getting investors to marketing your product.

The 2018 contestants were:

  • Andrew Bataller,  iPad Case  
  • Gerry Klassen, New Painting Tool
  • Phillip Perez for his Impact Tool shovel
  • Eric Robinson for his Green Launch orbital launch service
  • Michael Rodgers, The One-Handed Hamper
  • Dave Schmoyer, Pill or Parts Pal
  • Scott Swaaley, MAKESafe Power Tool Brake
  • Greg Wawrzyniak, Super Dooper Cord Looper
  • Chris Wzysoczanski, T-Shots – Disposable Reactive Target
  • Ruth Young-Loaeza for her hybrid sheet collection

  The First Prize of $1000 was won by Phillip Perez for his Impact Tool shovel. Second place was Ruth Young-Loaeza for her hybrid sheet collection, and third place was Eric Robinson for his Green Launch orbital launch service.

At the end of the meeting, SDIF Chairman Adrian Pelkus said “good-bye” to attendees after 13 years of leading the group.  He said, “I’ve been privileged to meet hundreds of my fellow inventors over the years and mentored so many here in San Diego.  I’ve been delighted to see many of your ideas get to market and honored to have assisted some of you along the way.  I am indeed sad to leave the local community. My plans are to accomplish a lot more for mankind and the environment by working on my large backlog of such projects.

I am especially proud to have play a part in bringing together over 40 inventor clubs around the county into the newly formed organization of inventor club leaders and to have been part of our first meeting with Andrei Iancu, the new director of the USPTO, and participate in meetings with Congressional Representatives in Washington, D. C. to educate them about how the America Invents Act and PTABs are hurting inventors.”

He added, “Thanks to my dear friends that helped me keep SDIF going all these years. Especial thanks to long-time supporters and fellow board members:  Leslie Wagner, David Waller, Sidney Wildesmith, Ben Gage, Judith Balian, Jennifer Joe, and Michele Nash-Hoff.”

Several of the above, including me, gave heartfelt testimonials to Adrian for his brilliant leadership of the group for these many years and wished him continued success with his own inventions.

Adrian announced that he was also dropping off the board of directors for U. S. Inventors and the United Inventors of America, but he urged everyone to continue to support patent reform.  He reminded everyone that we need strong intellectual property laws to defend their innovations.  He said, “The patent laws have become so weak that the independent inventor can no longer count on an issued patent to protect his right to profit from the labors of their mind. This strikes at the heart of what our founding fathers knew was the way to make the country great and made a foundation Article in the US constitution. We American Independent Inventors must stand and demand our rights be restored. Our nation needs us to create the new ideas and subsequent new jobs to continue to grow and thrive. The present patent laws must be revised to bring back the confidence a patent brings to both the inventor and investor.”

He encouraged everyone to see the movie Invalidated: The Shredding of the US Patent System, if they didn’t attend the SDIF viewing in August. The movie raises public awareness of the problems inventors are having with the patent system. (Note: You can also see the documentary on Amazon, free with Amazon Prime subscription, or $2 otherwise.)

In this session of Congress, there have been bills introduced to the House of Representatives and Senate to protect inventors’ patent rights, such as the STRONGER Patents Act 2017 (S. 1390), introduced by Senator Christopher A Coons  (D-DE), and the Inventor Protection Act  (H. R. 6557), sponsored by Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA). The most comprehensive BILL is the Restoring American Leadership in Innovation Act of 2018 (H.R. 6264)introduced by Congressman Thomas Massie (R-KY), an award-winning inventor and successful entrepreneur himself. It is co-sponsored by Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur (D-OH) and Congressman Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA). Its goal is to roll back some of the “worst parts” of the America Invents Act of 2011 and reverts patents back to first to invent, not the first inventor to file. All three bills are stuck in the Judiciary Committee.

I encourage you to contact your Congressional Representative to urge them to become a co-sponsor of one or all of the bills mentioned above. These bills must not languish in committee for the rest of this session.  We must pass legislation to restore our once great American patent system that was the envy of the world. Right now, inventors in China have more protection for their patents than inventors in the U.S.  We cannot let China become the innovation leader of the world.

.

Tags: , ,
Posted in Inellectual Property, Innovation, Legislation, Patent Reform, Technology | No Comments »

MFG Day Motivates Youth to Pursue a Career in Manufacturing

October 23rd, 2018

Since 2012, thousands of manufacturers around the country open their doors to inspire and recruit the next generation of manufacturers on Manufacturing Day (MFG Day), which was held this year on Friday, October 5th.

MFG Day is produced by the National Association of Manufacturers and the Manufacturing Institute. MFG DAY had ambitious goals: “to change public perception of manufacturing, inspire students to pursue manufacturing careers, and strengthen the future of manufacturing by avoiding the talent shortage on the horizon.” According to the MFG Day website, “We wanted to correct the idea that manufacturing involved repetitive, unskilled tasks that happened in dark, dirty factories — a ridiculous idea to anyone who has actually worked in manufacturing — and show people what manufacturing really looks like.”

Those of us in the industry know that today’s manufacturing jobs are high skilled, and take place in clean, well-lit, technologically advanced facilities. The problem was that there was no way to know whether perceptions were changing until Deloitte became a sponsor of MFG DAY in 2015 and conducted surveys of attendees.

The results of the survey of 2015 showed:

  • 81% of students emerged “more convinced that manufacturing provides careers that are interesting and rewarding.”
  • 62% of students were “more motivated to pursue a career in manufacturing”

The 2016 survey results showed that the percentages rose to 84% and 64% respectively.

The 2016 Deloitte report said, “Projections indicate that roughly 600,000 people attended MFG DAY events in 2016 and that 267,000 of them were students. That means that nearly 225,000 students walked away from their MFG DAY 2016 event with a more positive perception of manufacturing, according to Deloitte’s findings…. Based on the 267,000-student attendance figure, that’s potentially 171,000 new members of a next-generation manufacturing workforce.”

The Deloitte surveys showed that “71 percent of student attendees both years said that they “were more likely to tell friends, family, parents, or colleagues about manufacturing after attending an event,” meaning that they weren’t just convinced — they were inspired.”

This year, the MFG Day website listed 2,739 events planned across the country. In California, there were events planned at more than 250 locations throughout the state. The CMTC October 9th newsletter stated, “This year, CMTC and its California’s Manufacturing Network were much more active in sponsoring, organizing and coordinating events statewide. CMTC was also very committed in pairing up schools wishing to attend Manufacturing Day events with manufacturers and other organizations hosting open houses, career fairs, and expos. CMTC and its California’s Manufacturing Network’s efforts directly resulted in over 50 schools attending these events. At these events, students received first-hand exposure about today’s manufacturing technologies in industries that employ highly-skilled and well-paid individuals while offering exciting, rewarding, innovative work environments.”

Since I moved up to Hemet, CA in September, I attended events in Riverside County instead of San Diego County.  There were five events in the city of Riverside, one in Menifee, one Murrieta, one in Perris, and one in Redlands.  This is in comparison to my former home county of San Diego with 22 in the city of San Diego, three each in Carlsbad and San Marcos, two in El Cajon, and one each in Chula Vista, Oceanside, and Vista.

I attended only three events in Riverside County because they were located so far apart, and most of the events were held in the same time period between 10 AM and 2 PM. I began my day by attending the event in Menifee at Mt. San Jacinto College to introduce their new Makerspace to students.  The auditorium was nearly filled with students form Santa Rosa Academy where a panel of business professionals and professors shared the value of their education to their careers.  The event was sponsored by the City of Menifee, the Menifee Valley Chamber of Commerce, and CMTC. The audience was welcomed by Major Bill Zimmerman and Tony LoPiccolo, Executive Director of the Chamber.

Fortunately, I was able to get a private tour of the MakerSpace by Hal Edghill, the MakerSpace specialist, before the students had finished listening to the panelists. The MakerSpace has 15 inexpensive 3D printers and two more advanced 3D printers for students to use for their projects, as well as a small laser cutter/engraver. Mr. Edghill said the MakerSpace just opened in August, so this is the first semester it is available for students to use for projects.

There were so many students that they were divided into four groups for their tour.  Afterward, the students enjoyed pizza and soda before returning to school.

I then drove up to Riverside for a tour of Aleph Group, Inc. (AGI). AGI builds custom bloodmobiles, mobile medical and dental clinics, container hospitals, emergency command vehicles, mobile command centers, and specialty trailers, modular units, and vehicles.  Founder and President/CEO Jales De Mello conducted the tour personally, and we saw four projects in various stages of construction.  One bloodmobile was completed, ready to ship to Saudi Arabia.  Another nearly completed project was a mobile medical/dental clinic being built for a northern California Indian reservation.  The largest project under construction was a modular clinic.

Mr. de Mello said, “I started the company in 2001 with the goal of “making a positive on people’s lives. Our mobile health clinics are custom designed from the ‘ground-up,’ and are fully equipped for turnkey operation. Sizes range from 28 ft. up to 50 ft., and all of our vehicles and units are 100% wood-free construction, so as to eliminate all possibilities of bacteria and fungus growth associated with the use of wood products. The all-aluminum construction is lighter weight, has greater performance and longevity, and improves fire safety.” He believes that “his industry and its leaders must take a proactive approach in solving the needs of mankind.”

Next, I drove to Phenix Technology, Inc., which manufactures high quality fire helmets and other fire safety products and collectibles.  I arrived early for my 2:00 PM tour, so while the formal tour of manufacturing was being conducted, I had the pleasure of getting a private tour of their collectible museum of fire helmets from around the world and memorabilia related to fireman and fire stations. Museum tours are available upon request.

Phenix Technology, Inc was founded in 1972 by Former California State Fire Marshall, Ronnie Coleman and former Assistant Chief of the California State Fire Training Division, Ray Russell to make higher quality fire helmets. Four decades later, Phenix is still a family business who continues to proudly manufacture in the USA, and Mr. Coleman and Mr. Russell “are still there and available to answer any questions you might have about firefighter head protection.”

Tyler Meyer conducted the formal tour, and I saw three different styles of fire helmets being made in the production area.  Tyler said they have gone through Lean training and greatly improved their productivity and reduced lead times.  He said, “We can now make up to 20 helmets per hour instead of four.  Our lead times for most of our products, except for handmade leather helmets. went from 6 weeks to 6 hours in some cases. Our sales went up 51%, and our Net Operating Income went up 1600%+. We reduced our inventory by over $100,000, and our inventory turns are almost unmeasurable as we do everything just in time. We haven’t had any significant price increases in three years though our COGS increased as much as 30% because our controllable costs are down.”

He referred me to their Director of Global Operations, Angel Sanchez, Jr., who emailed me that “it is more important to talk about how Lean has created a culture of continuous improvement and total employee engagement. How Monday is most of our people’s favorite day of the week, not Friday. How we have learned that Lean is about creating a mindset where you see waste in everything and how everyone works together to eliminate it. If you are encouraging people to start a Lean journey, the focus has to be on the pillars of Lean, not the metrics.”

I was happy to get another example of the difference a Lean transformation can make in company performance and how important it is for American companies to become Lean enterprises to help rebuild American manufacturing.

I encourage more manufacturers to plan to participate in MFG Day in 2019.  Open your company to a tour.  Invite the families of your employees.  Invite your customers.  Invite the students of local high schools.  Invite your elected officials.  Many of them have never been in a manufacturing plant.  Let’s make 2019 the most successful MFG Day to date.

 

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Manufacturing, Technology, Training | No Comments »

Lean Frontier Summit Focuses on Transformation into Lean Enterprise

October 9th, 2018

On September 20-21,2018, Lean Frontiers held their annual Lean Leadership Summits at the Westin Hotel on Jekyll Island.  This was my fifth year to be invited as a speaker at the conference. This year’s summit continued the combination of Lean Management,/Lean Accounting, and Lean H.R./People Development summits that was begun last year.

Co-founder Dwayne Butcher explained last that year that “It’s about time that the whole enterprise be involved in becoming a Lean company. Lean is a business model and must therefore include every part of the business, including those in Executive Leadership, Accounting, HR, Sales, Product Development, Supply Chain. We need to breakdown the silos between these departments.”

Between the keynote speakers, there were four tracks related to Lean Management/Lean Accounting, and Lean H.R./People Development.  Besides giving my own presentation, “How Reshoring and Lean are Helping Rebuild Manufacturing,” based on my new book Rebuild Manufacturing – the key to American Prosperity, I attended the keynotes and several of the sessions in the Lean Management and Lean Accounting tracks.

Lean Frontiers is not a consulting firm. Its sole focus is to provide learning opportunities to

address:  Enterprise?wide adoption of Lean and the foundational skills needed to become a Lean company.

Co-founder Jim Huntzinger, said, “The first Lean Accounting Summit was held in 2005, and out of that summit, Lean Frontiers was born.  Lean is still perceived as a program with short term results by too many, and we need to make the transition to Lean as a business model.  We need to traverse unclear territory — trust the process to go from current condition to the target position. We can use XYZ Thinking:  If we do X, then we will get Y, but if we get Z instead, then we will learn.”

Mike DeLuca of the Lean Enterprise Institute introduced a Lean Accounting A3 for attendees to provide ideas on how to achieve the aspiration of having Lean Accounting be self-sustaining within five years.

Jim announced that the Journal of Cost Management has taken an interest in the summit and has a booth in the foyer. Lean Six Sigma Master Black Belt Gary Kapanowski, who is a Guest Editor for the Journal, invited attendees to sign up to contribute articles to the magazine in the coming year as they are interested in running more stories about Lean in the magazine.

Then, he introduced the first keynote speaker, Karen Martin, author and President of the Karen Martin Group, spoke about her new book, Clarity First.  Clarity was a concept that she introduced in her book, The Outstanding Organization, wherein she looked at common patterns at companies and individual performance. She covered four areas: clarity, focus, discipline, engagement in her previous book and was asked by her readers to expand on the topic of clarity.  She discussed “what is clarity and what it is not,” saying that “it is coherence, precision, and elegance. Information needs to be complete accurate and easy to understand. Think of your target audience as your customer. The opposite of clarity is ambiguity, which complicates, slows, frustrates, increases risk, and is expensive. Ambiguity is manmade and different than lack of certainty. Strategic ambiguity can be useful for certain purposes. “

She asked: “What type are you? Clarity pursuer, clarity avoider, clarity blind” She stated, “Children have a natural curiosity but it gets stamped down when they ask why. Same thing can happen at work. Close to curiosity is humility about how you are communicating and how you are being received. We have 180+ cognitive biases that affect communication. Rushing hampers clarity; take time to be clear. Fear can be underlining lack of clarity. Fear can be biggest reason for resistance to Lean transformation.

She explained that clarity liberates purpose, priorities, process, performance, and problem solving:

Purpose – great way to get people engaged about what you do.

Priorities – defining true north.

Process – Value stream thinking is critical to defining process

Processes: documented, current, followed, consistently monitored, regularly improved; Standard work description is necessary for each task

Problem solving – CLEAR

C = clarity

L = learn

E = experiment

A= access

R = Rollout

In conclusion she recommended, “Infuse clarity into your organization…You need a scoreboard at all levels of company showing how you are doing.”

Prior to the afternoon keynote speaker, Jean Cunningham announced the awardees for the Lean Enterprise Institute’s Lean Accounting professor and student awards.  Professor Laurie Burney of Baylor University and her student, Katie Kearny of KMPG received the award for their research on Lean Accounting that will be published this fall.

Harry Moser, founder and head of the Reshoring Initiative was the afternoon keynote speaker. He spoke on “TCO/Reshoring:  Simplify your Lean Journey, Improve Employee Morale.”  Harry developed the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) calculator that quantifies he hidden costs of doing business offshore, which is free for companies to use at www.reshorenow.org. Harry highlighted the fact that the tide turned in 2016 between offshoring and reshoring as reshoring increased by 500% and offshoring fell by 75%.  Reshoring and Foreign Direct Investment (foreign companies setting up plans in the U.S.) are responsible for an increase of nearly two million jobs in the U.S.  He reminded the audience that Lean leaders, W. Edwards Deming, John Shook, and Jim Womack all advised companies to identify the “true cost,” and that offshoring multiples the wastes to be eliminated through Lean:  overproduction, waiting transport, overprocessing, inventory, motion, and defects. He stated that among the top ten reasons for reshoring are:  “quality/rework/warranty issues, freight costs, inventory, intellectual property risk, rising wages, and communication problems.”

He said, “By understanding the advantage of producing near the consumer, and the small TCO gap instead of the large price gap, U.S. companies can justify domestic investment, process improvement, automation, training, etc., and they do not have to sacrifice quality, delivery, time-to-market, or employees to be competitive and profitable.”  He announced two awards for reshoring for 2019: the first Sewn Products Reshoring Award and the second Metalworking Reshoring Award.

In conclusion, he invited attendees to cooperate with the Reshoring Initiative by testing Made-in-USA impact on volume and price, incorporating TCO in your lean efforts, and documenting their reshoring cases.

The day ended with a Townhall Conversation on “The Lean Economy” in which panelists Jim Huntzinger, Tom Jackson, Harry Moser, and Bill Waddell discussed how Lean business and practice can be one of the most profound impacts for elevating a strong economy.

On Friday morning, Mike Wroblewski, author of Creating a Kaizen Culture and President of Dantotsu Consulting LLC, was the keynote speaker on the topic of “Leading a Lean Transformation.”  He said, “Most companies measure performance by EBITDA, which he defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Cutting heads is the first thing management does to improve EBITDA by reducing costs. Which path are you on? Lean can be like the path to hell. You need upper management support but you also need lower level support. There are two things you can control – your effort and your attitude.”

He was taught Lean by Shifeo Shinzo from Japan in 1985 when he worked at Hill-Ron. He shared, “We did Kaizen events all week for SMED and after repeated Kaizen events, we got our die change from one hour down to 4 1/2 minutes.” He admonished, “ Kaizen needs to be your way life. It’s the culture. Lean isn’t meant to find blame faster. What do you do in the course of the day? Check email, respond to emails, make phone calls, plan, etc. How much time should you spend in Gemba? You should be spending 80% of your time in the Gemba. The standard you walk by is the standard you set for others.”

Space doesn’t permit me to highlight all the excellent breakout presentations during the summit.  If you haven’t started on your Lean journey, I recommend that you do so soon. If you are already on a Lean journey,I encourage you to put next year’s Lean Leadership Week on your calendar.

 

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Lean, Manufacturing, Reshoring | No Comments »

Training for Skills and Lean are Important to San Marcos Region Companies

July 11th, 2018

My time in San Marcos, Texas included visits to more traditional companies, such as Mensor. On my first day, we met with Jason Otto, President of Mensor. He told me that he has been with the company for more than two decades, starting as an engineer, before moving up the management chain as product manager, director of sales, and other positions before becoming President.

He said, “Mensor was started in Houston in 1968 by Jerry Fruit and a small group of engineers from Texas Instruments. Jerry had an idea for designing and manufacturing precision pressure measuring and pressure calibration instruments and systems. The company shipped their first product, a quartz manometer for the aerospace industry, in 1970 and most of the company’s business was government contracts.

The company relocated to San Marcos in 1978, but in 1981, our building caught fire and burned to the ground. The company kept going with the help of vendors and customers while a new 26,000 sq. ft. building was built on the same site in only five months.  The employees kept their jobs by actually working to help build the new building.

Otto explained, “We acquired our control line of products from Texas Instruments and introduced new controller products in 1983, 1992, and 1997. We introduced a Quartz Pressure Calibrator in 2001, and the modern CPC6000 Automated Pressure Calibrator in 2004.

In 2006, we were acquired by WIKA Alexander Wiegand SE & Co. KG, a very large privately held company in Germany, with a U. S. facility in Lawrenceville, Ga. It was time for the owners of the company to “cash out,” and it was a smooth transition.

Our core competency is pressure sensor accuracy, and it is a very niche market.  It is tricky to hire talent, so we have to hire from competitors, as well as engineering graduates.  Texas State University, Texas A &M, and the University of Texas in San Antonio and Austin have provided many of our new engineers.  We also need calibration lab technicians, people skilled in technical assembly, as well as machinists for our in-house machine shop. We haven’t had any trouble hiring machinists.

I asked if the company has been through training in Lean Six Sigma, and he said, “Our Lean training started after our acquisition by WIKA. We currently have two Lean Six Sigma Black Belts, who do about 6 -8 kaizen events per year.  We practice 5S and use QCSD boards for visual management of teams. We put together cross functional teams, use cellular assembly, and have a vendor qualification program. We have never outsourced any of our manufacturing overseas, but we have customers in China and Malaysia. We use the WIKA global sales team, but use manufacturers reps to sell into Mexico and the maquilas because it is a long sales cycle. WIKA has 48 locations around the world, and as part of the WIKA Calibration Line, we represent about 6 percent of the company’s business.”

Next, we met with John Malik, General Manager of Altra Couplings in San Marcos. Malik said, “I grew up working in my dad’s auto parts store. I have been with the company since I graduated with an engineering degree and have survived three sets of company owners.  The company was started in Houston and moved to San Marcos in the early 1980s. We were sold to TH Woods in 1990, and then sold to ATR Inc. in 2007, whose corporate headquarters is located in Santa Ana, Calif. ATR has 28 plants and production facilities around the world, with seven locations in the U. S. We have about 120 employees currently.”

Malik explained, “We are a leading global designer, producer and marketer of a wide range of mechanical power transmission components. Our products control and transmit power and torque in virtually any industrial application involving movement and are sold in more than 70 countries worldwide in industries including: energy, general industrial, material handling, metals, mining, specialty machinery, transportation, and turf and garden. Our portfolio of products includes clutches, brakes, couplings, as well as gearing and power transmission components. However, we don’t do any high-volume couplings for the automotive industry.

When I asked about Lean, he said, “We have a team of company employees who have helped us become lean, and the productive gains are essential. It really comes down to asset utilization of people assets and capital assets.  You want to keep them adding value continuously. The approach we have taken is a value stream approach to our products. We go narrow and deep in an area and develop it, and then move on to another area.”

Malik added, “We have even implemented Lean Accounting.  I spent a lot of time with engineers to understand the true costs. We have some good decision rules for the “make or buy” decision process.  Our biggest promoter is our CFO, but our Lean program goes all the way to the top.”

I asked what Altra’s biggest problem is, and Malik responded, “Finding new employees. This is an area that doesn’t have a long tradition in manufacturing. People don’t know what manufacturing looks like, and the mind set for years has been getting a college degree rather than vocational training.   There are never enough trained applicants, so we train our own workers. We now have second and third generation workers. It is a lot about how we treat people and the opportunities for growth.”

He added, “We make all our own castings in our Erie, Penn. plant and buy the forgings we need.  We have three manufacturing facilities in the U.S. and have a plant in the U.K. We bought a company in Germany and have a plant in China.  That plant makes some parts for us, and we make some parts for them.  We also have a small facility in Brazil in order to have local content and avoid the high tariffs.”

On my last day in San Marcos, we visited CFAN, which was formed in 1993, as a 50/50 Joint Venture between GE Aviation and Saffron (SNECMA) of France. The partnership was created to introduce composite fan blades in a GE90 engine that powers the Boeing 777.  CFAN has leveraged the success of this product to introduce additional fan blades on the GEnx engines that power the Boeing 787 and Boeing 747-8.

We met with Mo Mattocks, who is the President and Plant Manager for CFAN. He is responsible for all plant operations including over 500 employees executing product delivery, quality, and productivity, as well as plant financial results and personnel safety. Mattocks said, “I am originally from New York, but graduated for the University of Michigan and Georgia Tech. I have worked for GE for 21 years and previously worked at the GE Aviation in Kansas City and Atlanta.”

He explained, ”CFAN successfully transferred the composite fan blade manufacturing process from the laboratory to the shop floor and delivered the first production GE90-94B fan blade in September 1994.  At first, our quality level was only about 80 percent, so there were a lot of rejects. We kept improving our processes using the widely recognized Six-Sigma methodology, focusing on eliminating defects and reducing variation in shop floor. Over the years, we kept improving our processes, so that our scrap rate is down to only about 1 percent.

In 2001, we started production of the composite fan blade for the GE90-115B growth engine. The GEnx1B fan blade was introduced to production in 2005 and the GEnx2B in 2007. In 2016, we started to make fan blades for the GE9nx, which had its first test flight last week. We are an approved FAA repair station for the GE90 and GEnx fan blades fan.  We have doubled our volume since 2009 and have produced more than 20,000 composite fan blades at our plant. We produce about 165 fan blades per week, and each fan blade takes about 340 hours. We expanded the plant from 160,000 sq. ft. to 275,000 sq. ft., and the whole plant is temperature controlled to keep the composite material from “curing” on hot days.”

I told Mr. Mattocks that in the past, I sold composite parts as a sales rep for a company located in Post Falls, Idaho so am familiar with the painstaking production methods used for pre-preg layup composite parts. When we walked the plant floor to see the whole production cycle from start to finish, I could see how meticulous the hand layup process is for these very critically dimensioned fan blades. It would be too tedious to describe the whole production process from start-to-finish, but the number of steps it takes to produce a finished fan blade was mind-boggling.

My last stop before leaving the San Marcos region to spend the weekend with my nephew and his family at their nearby ranch was to RSI Inc., located in Kyle, Texas. We met with President Harish Malkani, who founded the company in 1983. Malkani is originally from India where he earned a B.S. (Chemistry) from the University of Poona. He also received a degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of California at Berkeley and a Graduate Degree in Marketing from the University of California at Berkeley. He was employed with Ray Chem Corp. from 1969 to 1983.

While RSI’s website describes the company as distributor stocking and supplying standard mil-spec products including, but not limited to high-speed interconnect solutions and a wide range of electro-mechanical components, Malkani said, “I started the company as a distributor but over the years we became a value-added manufacturer. I can’t tell you about all of the defense and military programs for which we have used our expertise to provide solutions to the government and defense contractors because they were classified programs. We specialize in providing RFI/EMI solutions. We have done work for BAE, Lockheed, Raytheon, Aerojet, and other Department of Defense prime contractors.  We are a Silver certified supplier for Boeing. We also do work for companies in the energy, industrial, transportation, and the oil and gas industries.”

When we toured the shop floor, I could see that the company has the manufacturing, assembly, and test equipment to produce custom assemblies and systems for a variety of applications.

Malkani noted, “Our biggest problem is getting qualified workers.  I have hired from Texas State University, but I need more help in finding people with technical skills who are not engineers.  We are going to train some teachers at the local high school in our technology.”

He was assured by Dr. Cara DiMattina-Ryan, Director of Existing Business & Workforce Development at the Greater San Marcos Partnership (GSMP) that they would help him get connected to the local programs at the Austin Community College’s local Hays Campus.

Since finding technical skilled workers is critical to all of the companies I visited, I was happy that my hosts arranged for me to have lunch the first day with Dr. Hector Aguilar, who is the Executive Dean of Austin Community College’s Continuing Education division. He said, “Maintaining a talented and productive workforce in a growing local economy requires a commitment to employee development. ACC meets the training needs of businesses by partnering with them to tailor a custom learning curriculum that can be delivered on-site to employees. We have seven campuses in the western Austin region and have about 60,000 students enrolled.  Each community college in the Texas system specializes in training for the types of industries in their area. Houston specializes in oil and gas. Austin specializes in semiconductor, aeronautical, and sensor industries, and San Antonio specializes in training for automotive. “

He explained, “The Texas Workforce Commission is responsible for helping companies get training for their employees, and Texas pays for the training. Samsung was the first large manufacturing company for which we provided training when they came to the region. They received a grant of $3 million for the training. Samsung came up with 12 techniques to be taught in an around the clock program under a three-year program (24-hours a day, seven days a week).  The original 12 topics became 63 topics, and we trained 1,530 employees in the three years. We had to hire specialists in industries and then cross-train each one so they could teach multiple topics. We did a pre-test and post-test for students. The average pre-test score is 20 percent, and the average post-test score is 85 percent.

He added, “Under our Workforce Solutions Rural Capital Area, training for future employees is provided for free.  For example, when EPIC Piping bought an existing facility in San Marcos in 2014, they needed to hire new employees. They do specialized welding of pipes. GSMP came to us to help set up training for new employees.”

I was informed by Ashley Gossen, Vice President of Marketing & Communications for GSMP that underemployment is high in the region – a selling point for companies looking for talent. She said that the greater San Marcos region has more than 5,400 workers with bachelor or graduate degrees working in jobs that don’t require them.

It is obvious that the San Marcos region has a great deal to offer startup, existing, and transplant manufacturers: a good business climate, low taxes, skilled workers, and the educational facilities and programs to train new workers.

 

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Economic Development, Innovation, Manufacturing, Training, Workforce Development | No Comments »

New Material Technologies Spur Growth in San Marcos, Texas Region

June 21st, 2018

During my visit to San Marcos in March, I visited a diverse group of manufacturers both as to products and size of company.  The first company I visited, Urban Mining Company, is still in Austin waiting to relocate to San Marcos when their 100,000-square-foot building is ready later this year.

Right after being picked up from the airport by my hosts, we met with Scott Dunn, who is the CEO of Urban Mining Company. Dunn said that he had attended the United States Naval Academy and then received a degree from the University of Southern California. He said, “I started the company in late 2015, and we moved into our first space in January 2016.

We sought major investors from around the county because we wanted to be able to commercialize our technology very quickly. Out of 90-100 investor groups, there were only a few that fit our bill.  We spent a lot of time and money protecting our Intellectual Property with patents. We knew that we had original technology and had to be able to protect it. In June 2016, we secured $25M Series A Funding for to build our recycled rare earth magnet manufacturing facility.  After careful consideration, we chose San Marcos because it offers the skilled workforce and infrastructure needed to support our fast-growing operation. Once the facility is complete, we will be adding more than 100 manufacturing and technology jobs to the region.”

He explained, “I spent a lot of time in China to build relationships and skills to be able to buy down time from factory owners in China that had over capacity. Because of where we are right now, we are able to get a supply of components to use for recycling the rare earth materials. We are the only company producing Neodymium Iron Boron (Nd-Fe-B) rare earth permanent magnets in the United States. Our company’s patented Magnet-to-Magnet process repurposes domestic source materials from end-of-life products, such as hard disks or motors, to manufacture high-performance Nd-Fe-B magnets, using zero chemical inputs and wastewater. The magnets are then used to support the development of technology applications across the consumer, medicine, defense, aerospace, clean energy, and industrial sectors.

He added, “Most people don’t understand the ubiquity of magnets. The only rare earth mine and production facility in the U. S., MolyCorp Inc., went into bankruptcy in 2010, and the assets were bought by Chinalco’s subsidiary, Shenghe Resources in 2011.  The equipment was dismantled and moved China.  It’s critical that we develop this technology because China has the goal of controlling the supply of rare earth products by 2025.  If they succeed, then they could control the world. “

He concluded, “We are working with Tesla, GM, Ford, and many other OEMs like Raytheon, Northrop Grumman, and Boeing to develop products for the commercial and military/defense industries. I believe that reusing rare magnets is critical to a cleaner future, and we have created a closed loop supply chain to upcycle these materials into products that can have a positive impact.”

When we visited Texas State University’s incubator, STAR Park, we met with Dr. John C. Carrano, founder and CEO of Paratus Diagnostics, a firm that specializes in medical devices for point-of-care diagnostics.

 I asked Dr. Carrano how long he has been in the incubator. He responded, “We have been here just over two and a half years, but I actually founded the company in 2012. We are well past the startup phase and are about 18 months away from being cash positive. It’s a long and complex product development cycle for medical devices. Medical diagnostics is not viewed by investors as a get-rich-quick kind of venture, but it is going to be a $10 billion industry in the future. “

I asked him about his background that led him to start the company, and he said, “I retired from the Army in 2005 after 24 years. I am originally from Long Island, NY, but obtained my B.S. from West Point and my Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin. I was recruited to teach at the United States Military Academy at West Point in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. Then, I was recruited to be a program manager at DARPA where I led several major Defense Department programs related to bio-sensing after the Anthrax attacks occurred in Washington, D. C.  Prior to founding Paratus, I was Vice President of Research and Development at Luminex Corporation., a medical device company, and developed an implantable device to diagnose a medical threat.

He explained, “Our goal as Paratus Diagnostics is to develop point-of-care diagnostic solutions to make healthcare more accessible and affordable. Our hand-held Paratus PreparedNow® System and the ParatusSDS® Cartridge, allows clinicians to make decisions during a patient visit – resolving issues associated with lengthy delays waiting on lab results and improving patient outcomes. There is a big need to diagnose periodontal gum disease because of the serious health consequences if it goes untreated, so our first diagnostic test will be a periodontal test as there is zero competition in this market. Our device tests for the six highest risk periodontal pathogens and two key cytokines using saliva.  The results are provided in 20 minutes and displayed on a smart phone by color bar graphs.

We have 26 full-time employees and will probably be up to 37 by year end.  We have raised $5 million in private equity from angel investors. We also have grants and plan to launch the product into the marketplace in about 18 months.”

At the STAR Park incubator, we also met with Tim Burbey, President of Blueshift Materials.

He said, “Dr. Garrett Poe and I founded the company in 2013 with the mission to commercialize Polymer Aerogels. In July 2014, we became a member of the FLEXcon Holdings family of companies. In 2015, we officially launched our AeroZero® line of products, which consisted of rolled film and monoliths. This was the first commercially available Polyimide Aerogel in the world. Its creation derived from customer demand for a clean, lightweight, small footprint insulation material that can easily be incorporated into composites. We wanted to be ale to make the material in a continuous way as it had always been done in a batch process. We call the products aerogels because they are similar to a foam and are 85% air.  It starts out as a polyimide resin and through a proprietary process, it is transformed into the various aerogel products.”

He said, we moved into the STAR Park incubator in the fall of 2016 and also have an applications engineering lab facility in New Braunfels, TX (about 20 miles southwest). We also polymerize our own materials from polyimide at our facility in San Antonio, TX. We have a good relationship with the Materials Science, Engineering, and Commercialization (MSEC) program at Texas State University and have hired graduates.”

He showed me several different shapes and styles of the products they can make now, from blocks to film to powder. It had good properties for thermal management. Since it is 100% plastic, it is very good for incorporating into composites.

He explained, “Our product designs have applications across the aerospace, cryogenic, membrane separation, radio frequency, electronics, and automotive industries. We make a film for a Formula One race car by adding it to Kapton.  We work with a lot of electronics and RF product companies. Our materials have RF transparency, so will allow signals to go through, but they also provide thermal management.  Our polymer aerogels can withstand extremes of temperature from as hot as 300 degrees C down to as cold as -200 degrees C. Our polymer aerogel has a high strength to weight ratio, especially when bonded to other materials and as a composite core. Our new process for make aerogel film will only take minutes to make vs. weeks, which will greatly reduce cost and open new markets.”

He added, “We are developing new products by teaming with a research company in Palo Alto to look at using different polymers besides polyimide. In June 2016, we got a $3 million Department of Energy DOE grant to develop transparent and thermally insulating Aerogel for single pane windows as part of a project to restore historic windows in the Northeast.”

On the second day of my trip I also met with Paul Brown, President of Bautex Systems LLC, which is focused on transforming the building industry by providing builders and architects with smarter, stronger, more versatile building materials and solutions. He is a serial entrepreneur, who earned his undergraduate degree from the Plan II honors program at The University of Texas at Austin and his MBA at Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business. He has enjoyed a diverse career working in industries ranging from technology and telecommunications to construction products.

He said, “I had moved back to Austin, TX during the dot.com bust and was involved in a VOIP company. I love to build and started building houses.  I found a technology very similar to the Bautex technology,” and he invested in the company. But, he wanted to do manufacturing in the right way, and that company needed a better manufacturing process. “Oliver Lee is my business partner, and we did the original research in 2007.

We found the right machine in Europe, so in 2008, we had some custom molds made and took them over to Europe. We rented factory time for two weeks and replaced the wood filler with polystyrene to make blocks. We mixed the ingredients together and poured it into the mold.  It was an expensive and slow process. We added sand to the blocks and reduced cycle time to 30 seconds to make four 32 X 16-inch blocks in the mold. We had a goal of a weight of less than 50 lbs.

We spent a couple of years doing R & D before we moved to San Marcos, TX. We started shipping products in 2013 and now have six plants along the I-35 corridor.”

He explained, “The Bautex Wall System, comprised of a proprietary cement mixture and expanded polystyrene (EPS), is used to build interior and exterior walls for commercial and residential construction. The benefits to the contractor is that it is complete system that simplifies construction by combining structure, enclosure, continuous insulation, and air and moisture protection in a single, integrated assembly. With the Bautex Wall System, architects can specify an integrated solution that can be installed by a single contractor, saving time, effort and cost.  We are two and a half times what the new building energy codes started requiring in 2016.  Our system provides 26% more energy savings.”

He said, “We need a new paradigm for construction in this country. The process of building has to be better. When you analyze building construction, 90% of the work to build a house is non-value-added.  We need to reduce the costs of construction, and the buildings need to perform better. We had five buildings that were within five miles of Hurricane Harvey, and they did well.”

He added, “Six of the ten fastest growing counties are in Texas, but the access to labor for the construction industry is not here. There is a shortage of masons in Texas. Panelization in construction is appealing to a new generation of contractors.  His concern with panelization is that the industry has stayed with the same old technology. In 2020, a new building code will take effect, and each code changes pushes the bar higher.

We are now building one- to three-story buildings, and we can build faster than traditional construction methods using our Bautex Wall System. We have been nearly 99% commercial, but now we are going after residential work.“

Notice that three of the four companies we visited have developed products using new materials for diverse applications. These companies are examples of the spillover of research in technologies related to the MSEC program at Texas State University.

Tags: , ,
Posted in Accelerators/Incubators, Economic Development, Innovation, Manufacturing, Technology | No Comments »

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »